This entry was posted on Wednesday, November 12th, 2008 at 6:10 am and is filed under Sports. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
As we sports fans know, the best drama is unscripted. (Of course, a lot of the worst drama is unscripted too, but bear with me.) The finale to the Formula One season proved this as Lewis Hamilton lost the World Championship on the penultimate lap and then won it again on the penultimate corner at Interlagos.
As Hamilton crossed the line, the Ferrari garage celebrated what they thought was the triumph of their man, Felipe Massa, unaware that Hamilton had grabbed the all-important fifth position. Their joy was checked by one of their own engineers informing them of their error, live in front of millions of viewers worldwide. It was ridiculously entertaining TV.
But as much as I delighted in it, it was coloured by some envy towards the dedicated Formula One fan who has followed the entire season with intent.
I was aware of the significance of the moment: I had vaguely followed events throughout the year; I’d had a good look at the standings going into the race; I knew something about Massa and some more about Hamilton; I had a good idea about how it all fit into the history of the sport. But that’s just it – I knew all these things; the dedicated fan felt them.
I could sense how special the moment was, and it would take an insensate fool not to have been moved by the drama. But switching on the movie as the final scene begins means that your appreciation is superficial compared to one who has been watching from the start, for whom the denouement has the cumulative weight of what has gone before.
This can also apply to football. I’ve noticed it ever more since one of broadband’s tentacles finally slithered its way to my particular outpost. The internet’s main purpose – ripping life into tiny squares which catch the draft and fly out through the open window – is served well by football. It isn’t difficult to find yourself having been on YouTube for rather longer than you’d thought, watching stupendous goal after stupendous goal.
This was, in fact, how I spent my first hour on broadband, starting with Dennis Bergkamp’s goal against Argentina in 1998 and working my way from there through my memory and the Related Videos links. Some helpful souls save us the bother of all that clicking by lovingly compiling some great strikes, almost invariably accompanied by the strains of Linkin Park, or a band that sounds a lot like Linkin Park. Once you’ve turned the sound off, it can be addictive.
There is much beautiful in a great goal, or other display of skill, that is obvious to anyone watching it. It is a triumph of the game that it is so instantly accessible (aesthetically, to go along with the modern technological accessibility). But this type of appreciation, of something presented as if it were a discrete occurrence, can only ever go so deep. A lot of the beauty gets lost when a goal is taken out of its context.
Its full meaning in only apparent to someone who has seen it as it happened, who has seen what went before it. Not knowing when the next goal is going to happen gives it a certain oomph when it does. Goals happen rarely enough in soccer for this to remain strong, yet often enough that we don’t get too restless waiting for the next one to come along. The same is true on a larger scale for particularly great goals. It is hard to be surprised after a TV presenter’s introductory “How about this for a goal?” or by a YouTube video with ‘GOLAZO’ in the title. There is some anticipation in wondering exactly which of the infinite variety of possible goals you are about to see, but that is minor compared to not knowing whether you are going to see a goal at all.
In feeling the significance of a goal, it helps to know what impact it had on the game. If you’re just watching a clip, you might know what the score was, when the goal was scored and perhaps the flow of the game until that point. Even if you don’t know all this, any kind of experience watching football will tell you that it probably means something.
But all you can do from this is piece together a replica. It is only an approximation of what the goal would have meant if you had seen everything leading up to it. The beauty comes not only from the simple fact, from the particular geometry of player movement and the flight of the ball, but from when, as a better writer than this one put it, “a clear intention emerges to triumph over the arbitrary swirl opposing it“. There is no short-cut towards earning this: it only comes from watching the entire game.
Bergkamp’s goal was beautiful not only for Frank de Boer’s pass or Bergkamp’s first touch, or Bergkamp’s second or third touches, come to that. It was because of when it happened, because of the game in which it happened, because of the particular round of the particular tournament in which it happened, because of the history of the teams and players involved, because nobody could have foreseen it. If you saw it for the first time on the evening news, you didn’t get the half of it.
I’m more than glad that sites like 101 Great Goals exist. I’m glad that the latest wonderstrike from an African Cup of Nations qualifier or a Copa Sudamericana prelim is but a URL away. I’m glad that if I want to – and I will – while away some dead time indulging my sweet tooth, I can. It’s still just a half-truth, though.
Fredorrarci is the lord of all he surveys at Sport Is A TV Show.
“Earning it: why patience is a virtue for football fans” was originally published at Soccerlens.com – Football News.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.